Mainechicken – I presume this is the author of “Half a Life”:
He is also the only C S Jarvis I can find on ABW medals rolls on Ancestry. His IY attestation papers and ABW service record can be found on both Ancestry & FMP. He was born is Essex in July 1879, but was brought up in Kingston-upon-Thames where he attended the Grammar School. His father John Bradford Jarvis is listed on the 1891 Census as an “Insurance Agent & Artist”. Further investigation shows he is recognised as an artist who exhibited at the Royal Academy and recently two of his paintings (both prominently featuring black & white cows) were auctioned by a London Gallery with an estimate of £60-£100 for the pair.
On New Year’s Day 1900 Claude Scudamore Jarvis (aged 20 years 6 months) attested in London for service in the IY but was assigned to the 31st (Montgomeryshire) Company of the IY. His service record shows he sailed for SA on 18th March 1900 and was involved in the surrender of Prinsloo and actions at Harmnon’s (?) Kraal & Warm Baths. In the Brandwater Basin, I believe the 31st Company’s involvement was the escorting of prisoners. He stepped on the soil of England again on 7th May 1901 and about a month before the first wave of the 31st Company officially arrived back. He was awarded the QSA with CC, OFS, Tr & SA1901 clasps. The July 1901 medal roll comments that he was invalided on 5th January 1901. My reading of this is that in January 1901 he went sick and spent the rest of his time in SA in hospital/convalescing. This view is reinforced by the fact he was not discharged a day or two after he returned to England (which was standard for IY men) but it was 60 days before he was discharged suggesting a further period of medical treatment/care under the auspices of the army. Thus, allowing 3 weeks for both voyages, his South African service comprised 8 months in the field and 4 months hospitalised/convalescing.
He died December 1953 in Ringwood, Hampshire as shown by this clipping from the Evening News of 10 December 1953.
I totally agree with his writings regarding the provision of food to the combatants in the two wars but, again, the main reason for the difference was the different nature of the wars - WW1 was a static war whereas the war of 1899-1902 was a highly mobile war – supplying a static army is a much easier task than supplying a mobile army. The canny burghers recognised this and during the guerilla phase, to me, seem to have put as much effort into denying supplies to the Imperial Army as trying to kill them. CSJ also points out, presumably from personal experience, that during WW1 they did run into problems with the supply of food in Palestine – Palestine was a (rare) non-static theatre of war in WW1.