Elmarie, thank you for your reaction and also many thanks for creating the excellent and really useful research databases at the Museum.
I am a bit puzzled by your remark in relation to my suggestion. I didn't envisage massive amounts of data to be added. The information available in the referred databases now often state “Country Unknown, Camp Unknown”, etc. If these words were to be exchanged for, say, St. Helena and Deadwood and perhaps a single paragraph is added with more information about the person, I don’t see how that could have any negative effect on the operations of the site.
At any point in time there are dozens (hundreds?) of POW related envelopes offered for sale in online auctions. Thousands of these covers (as well as letters, named POW handiwork, diaries, what have you) sit in private collections. Continually scouring all the (online) auctions for missing information is a massive task and, off-course, the items that are kept in collections are on the whole inaccessible to museum staff. By mobilising external parties such as members of this site and other collectors to help uncover missing parts of the puzzle (and suggest correction for double listings, names,, dates etc.), the Museum and this website, would be able to keep improving the quality of their databases with information from non-public sources and/or without continuous on-line research. This is in the interest of all concerned. The purpose of this thread is thus simply to establish the best manner in which new information could be contributed to the databases by external parties in a simple and perhaps standardised form.