Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

Battle of Diamond Hill or Donkerhoek 2 years 6 months ago #83020

  • Wisetraveller
  • Wisetraveller's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh recruit
  • Fresh recruit
  • Posts: 19
  • Thank you received: 8
I have part of a shell fired at the Boer lines during the above engagement. The brass top of the shell is dated 12/99 followed by R (separated by the arrow symbol) l IV. Although damaged, it appears to be roughly 3 inches in diameter.
I would any suggestions as to the type of shell.
Attachments:
The following user(s) said Thank You: Rob D

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Battle of Diamond Hill or Donkerhoek 2 years 6 months ago #83021

  • Rob D
  • Rob D's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 927
  • Thank you received: 885
It's the nose cone of a 15 pr shrapnel shell, the commonest shell of the war. Part of the fuze and the bell washer have come off.
The past is not dead. In fact, it's not even past.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Wisetraveller

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Battle of Diamond Hill or Donkerhoek 2 years 6 months ago #83028

  • Neville_C
  • Neville_C's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 1706
  • Thank you received: 2717
As Rob states, this a nose cone of a 15-pdr BL shrapnel shell, retaining the base of a T&P fuze of the type "Time and Percussion No 56, Mark IV" (Treatise on Ammunition 1902, p. 172).

MARKINGS: 12/99 [date of manufacture] "R /|\ L" [Royal Laboratory], "IV" [Mk IV]

Sometimes there is a batch number after the Royal Laboratory mark. For example "178" would indicate that the fuze was amongst the 178th thousand manufactured.




,,
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Moderators: djb
Time to create page: 0.610 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum