Since giving my opinion on the manufacture and naming of the Rebellion Medal, I have looked again at the background to the Medal given with the medal roll published by the Naval & Military Press. It states that "The Goldsmiths and Silversmiths Ltd., of London (now Garrard & Co. Ltd.), designed, manufactured and apparently also named the medals." So it seems that the dies that turned up in Maritzburg must have been sent there from London after the manufacture and naming had been completed. If the naming was indeed done in London, then it is likely that the device used for the characteristic light impressed naming was also sent to Maritzburg. I have the medal of Cpl John Silamela, Natal Native Horse, which, according to the roll, was officially re-engraved and re-issued on 15th March 1962, and the naming is no different from the naming of other Rebellion Medals in my collection. Perhaps Garrard & Co still have records that could finally settle this matter.
Officially, the less Britain had to do with commemorating the suppression of this rebellion, the better the Government in London would have liked it. One of the most vocal critics was Winston Churchill, who referred to Natal as that "hooligan Colony", and he hesitated "to impress upon them an Imperial Medal, in view of the distaste which this Colony has so strongly evinced for outside interference of all kinds." One well supported recommendation for the award of a Victoria Cross was reduced to a 'Mentioned in Despatches' in London, and this rebuff also applied to all except three officers who had distinguished themselves in the field. Only the three most senior officers were awarded British decorations. Ironically, they were the men ultimately most culpable for the excesses that so upset the liberals in Britain. By contrast, the Colony had its own solution for rewarding the others ranks:
Distinguished Conduct Medal (Natal) (MYB 42), of which eight were awarded, and the Colonial Meritorious Service Medal (Natal) (MYB 212), of which 12 were awarded.
Brett