Hi
The next “exhibit” was bought from a Pretoria jeweller in August 1974 for the sum of R70-. At that early collecting stage I knew nothing about medals to Jameson Raiders and was just delighted to add the first BSA Co medal to my collection
In 1893 Geoffrey Manderville Osborn Springfield was a Trooper in in the BB Police, at the time of the Raid he was Troop Sgt Major, “D” Troop, MMP, in 1896 he was Sgt Maj, MRF and in 1897 Lieut in the BSA Police.
His BSAP service ended under a cloud. He was charged with “Theft” in July 1897 which was changed to “Obtaining money under false pretences” in August 1897. The case arose from his claim of £50 from the BSA Co as “compensation for a bay stallion which he had declared to be his own private property, knowing the same to have been the property of the Company”.
The trial was on 18 October 1897 and was reported in the “Rhodesia Herald”.
Col F de Moleyns had received a letter from Springfield on 6 January making the claim, and this was produced in Court. Springfield said that when he came up from Mafeking he brought the horse with him. He shod and fed it at his own expense and gradually came to regard it as his own. He had been told when he came to Rhodesia that he could not keep it, and as it had cost him so much "he determined that he should not lose money over him... He had previously had a horse of his own, when at Mangwe, which had been commandeered by the Company, and for which he had never received a penny compensation, although he had sent in several claims, and he thought he was merely putting the one against the other. He admitted that he had made a mistake, and pleaded guilty to the act, but not to the intent."
He had been "Simply bewildered" when charged with theft.
Sub-Inspector Birch confirmed that Springfield had had a horse of his own at Mangwe, worth between £100 and £120, and that it was taken by (he thought) Captain van Rooyen, and that Springfield had received no compensation. "With respect to the horse which died at Hartley, this must have cost the prisoner at least £50 in food, and for this also he received no compensation. For a year the prisoner had done his work on the Company's horse...Considering that the prisoner had been under arrest for six months, two of which he had actually been in jail, he thought he should be treated as leniently as possible. He (Sub-Insptr. Birch) was perfectly certain that no man in his right mind would have done what the prisoner had done if he had had any deliberate intention of defrauding the Company. It was a piece of stupidity in the first place, and was also, perhaps, partly owing to the fact that at the time the prisoner was on duty at an out-station where he could not easily approach the authorities. Under all the circumstances he thought that the prisoner should be discharged."
The Magistrate said he would take all circumstances into consideration, but the fact remained of the letter of 6 January: so "He would not even be able to give him the option of a fine but for the very peculiar nature of the circumstances of the case." He was found Guilty on the amended charge and given the option of a £10- fine or one month’s imprisonment. He opted for the fine.
I got the medal with the 1897 bar loose on the ribbon. Although Springfield was entitled to it, it is unclear whether the bar was forfeited after his conviction. Whatever the legalities, Springfield decided to keep it!
The photo is from negative 17239 in the Zimbabwe Archives. It is captioned “Bob Sanders’ Store and Hotel, Mangwe Fort, Dec 1893. L-R : Sgt Springfield, Bob Sanders (at back), Charles Case, Tommy Ruil”. The date, however, is not correct and should be
Dec 1896
Henk