This morning I was reading Pakenham's account of Sannah's Post.
He bases part of his narrative on Major Phipps-Hornby manuscript which he says in the notes had been loaned to him.
I have looked for the manuscript in the National Archives without success. Does anyone have access to a copy please?
In WO105/7 in Broadwood's 25 page report, sent to the C-in-C on 30 April 1900.
He does list the two batteries but without numbers on p1.
There are no other relevant mentions in Broadwood's report.
In a full battery, there are 171 men and 131 horses, commanded by a Major, six 16 pounders, three transport wagons and a blacksmith. The two batteries sent out from Bloemfontein by Roberts would not be at full strength due to losses, illnesses etc.
The whole of U Battery was captured. From the published casualty rolls, there are 56 names.
An analysis of the U Battery prisoners by ranks on 31 March 1900 shows:
Those wounded, killed and prison from Q Battery on 31 March 1900:
Pakenham mentions two more salient points:
'Each of the 6 guns .. a total of 50 officers and men' (p393 in my edition) and that 'of the original 50 officers and men, only one officer (Phipps-Hornby), one sergeant, one corporal and eight men were still in action' (p394).
The visit by Earl Roberts to Woolwich (reported in
The Times
on14 January 1902, was to present medals to some Boer War veterans and the plate to Q Battery.
There were 80-90 men of Q Battery, excluding Colonel Phipps-Hornby, dressed in khaki. Some of Q Battery who had been discharged may have been represented in the 100-150 men in civilian dress who are unnamed in the newspaper report.
88 men of Q Battery are named. Some of these will not have been at Sannah's Post as they will have joined/been posted to Q Battery after March 1900. An example is
Gunner Boyce
This has not advanced the knowledge on who was there that fateful day except to suggest the number of Q Battery men numbered approximately 53. Perhaps the report by Phipps-Hornby may help?